A Study on the Qualities of Effective EFL Teachers from the Perspectives of Preparatory Program Turkish EFL Students
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the characteristics of effective EFL teachers from the perspectives of preparatory program Turkish EFL students. To achieve this purpose, 93 preparatory program Turkish EFL students from the Foreign Languages School of a state university located in the west part of Turkey participated in the study. The questionnaire designed by Salahshour & Hajizadeh (2013) was utilized in this study by the researcher with some minor modifications on it. The findings of this study showed that being enthusiastic and lively, having interest in his/her job and feeling responsibility for teaching, being creative and spontaneous, being self-confident, having a loud and clear voice and having patience with students were the prominent personal traits of effective EFL teachers. The findings also revealed that the majority of the students viewed their teacher as an effective EFL teacher because s/he presented the topic via a variety of examples, had adequate level of linguistic knowledge, pedagogical knowledge and communication skills and dealt with them individually and s/he was patient to them. Lastly, the findings of this study regarding (a) command in English, (b) teaching methodology, (c) evaluation method, (d) amount of teacher’s emphasis on different language skills, (e) mastery over teaching, (f) teacher-student relationship and (g) classroom management were in line with those of previous studies conducted by other researchers in the related literature. Keywords: effective teachers, EFL, effective EFL teachers, EFL students, teacher qualitiesReferences
References
Abu Rahma, M. (2007). Qualities of the good language teacher as perceived by prospective teachers of English in the Arab world. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 1, 99-124.
Arıkan, A., TaÅŸer, D., & Saraç-Süzer, H. S. (2008). “The effective English language teacher from the perspectives of Turkish preparatory school studentsâ€. Education and Science, 33, 42-51.
Aydın, B., Bayram, F., Canıdar, B., Çetin, G., Ergünay, O., Özdem, Z. & Tunç, B. (2009). Views of English language teachers on the affective domain of language teaching in Turkey. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 263-280.
Badshah, I. (2016). Different qualities of effective EFL teachers. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. The British University in Dubai.
Barnes, D. B., & Lock.G. (2010). The attributes of effective lecturers of English as a foreign language as perceived by students in a Korean university. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 139-152.
Baytur, B. & Razı, S. (2015). The characteristics of effective EFL teachers from the perspective of Turkish EFL learners. International Journal of Human Behavioral Science, 1(2), 1-9.
Benson, L., Schroeder, P., Lantz, C., & Bird, M. (2001). Student perceptions of effective
teachers. Retrieved March 20, 2019 from: http://www.usfca.edu/ess/sym2001/PDFbooks/
naspe/naspep53-56.pdf.
Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 3-31.
Brosh, H. (1996). Perceived characteristics of an effective language teacher. Foreign Language Annals, 29(2), 25-38.
Case, A. (2013). How to teach giving examples. Retrieved April 10, 2019 from: https://www.englishclub.com/efl/tefl-articles/how-to-teach-giving-examples/
Çakır, İ. (2006). Developing cultural awareness in foreign language teaching. TOJDE, 7(3), 154-161.
Çelik, S., Arıkan, A., & Caner, M. (2013). In the eyes of Turkish EFL learners: What makes an effective foreign language teacher? Porta Linguarum, 20, 287–297.
Chen, R. (2005). Chinese tertiary students’ perceptions of a good EFL teacher. Sino-US English Teaching, 2(4) (Serial No. 16). Retrieved March 14, 2007 from: http://www.linguist.org.cn/doc/su200504/su20050406.doc
Chen, J. (2012). Favourable and unfavourable characteristics of EFL teachers perceived by university students in Thailand. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), 213–219.
Chen, Y.J. & Lin, S.C. (2009). Exploring characteristics for effective EFL teachers from the perceptions of junior high school students in Tainan. STUT Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 219-249.
Cheung, Y. L. (2002). The attitude of university students in Hong Kong towards native and non-native teachers of English. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Cheung, H. Y. (2006). The measurement of teacher efficacy: Hong Kong primary in-service teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 32(4), 435-451.
Cruickshank, D. R., & Haefele D. (2001). Good teachers, plural. Educational Leadership, 58(5), 26-30.
Dinçer, A, Göksu, A, Takkaç, A & Yazıcı, M. (2013). Common characteristics of an effective English language teacher. The International Journal of Educational Researchers, 4(3), 1-8.
Edington, C.A. (2001). Qualities of good and bad teachers as seen by Japanese students. Handbook of Hokkaido University of Education, Sapporo, Japan.
Farahian, M & Rezaee, M. (2012). A Case Study of an EFL Teacher's Type of Questions: An Investigation into Classroom Interaction. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 161-167.
Faranda, W.T., & Clarke I. (2004). Student observations of outstanding teaching: Implications for marketing educators. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(3), 271-281.
Ghasemi, B., and Hashemi, M. (2011). The study of the characteristics of successful English language teachers from the view point of the English language students of Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 411-415.
Hajizadeh, N. & Salahshour, N. (2014). Characteristics of effective EFL instructors: Language teachers’ perceptions versus Learners’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(1), 202-214.
Kember, D., & Wong, A. (2000). Implications for evaluation from a study of students’ perceptions of good and poor teaching. Higher Education, 40, 69-97.
Khaerati, K. (2016). The Students’ Perception on the Characteristics of Effective and Ineffective English Language Teachers. ELT Worldwide, 3(2), 221-230
Khojastemehr, R. & Takrimi, A. (2009). Characteristics of effective teachers: Perceptions of
the English teachers. Journal of Education & Psychology, 3(2), 53-66.
Malikow, M. (2006). Effective teacher study. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 16(3), 1-9.
Mercer, N., Hennessy, S. & Warwick, P. (2010). Using interactive whiteboards to orchestrate classroom dialogue. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 195-209.
Nghia, T. L. H. (2015). Vietnamese Students’ Perception of English Teacher Qualities: Implications for Teacher Professional Development. International Journal of Academic Research in Education and Review, 3(January (1)), 7–19.
Park, G. P. & Lee, H. W. (2006). The characteristics of effective English teachers as perceived by high school teachers and students in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(2):236-248.
Ramazani, M. (2014). Mismatches in beliefs between teachers and students, and characteristics of effective English teacher: An Iranian context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1518-1527.
Rammal, S.M. (2006). The other side of the mirror: ESL students offer their opinions of good language teaching. Article retrieved from the UsingEnglish.com website on March 14,2007 from: http://www.usingenglish.com/articles/other-side-mirror.html
Ribahan, S. (2018). Students’ Perceptions of the Characteristics of Effective English Teachers at Mataram State Institute of Islamic Studies, Lombok. The Asian EFL Journal, 20(11), 16-28.
Richards JC (2001). The role of textbooks in a language program. Cambridge University Press.
Salahshour, N. & Hajizadeh, N. (2013). Characteristics of effective EFL instructors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 163-173.
Shishavan, H. B., & Sadeghi, K. (2009). “Characteristics of an effective English language teacher as perceived by Iranian teachers and learners of Englishâ€. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 131-143.
Stella, K., & Dimitris, E. (2013). Students’ perceptions of effective EFL teachers in university settings in Cyprus. English Language Teaching(11), 1-16.
Telli, S., den Brok, P., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2008). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the ideal teacher. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(149), 118-125.
Vialle, W., & Tischler, K. (2009). Gifted students’ perceptions of the characteristics of effective teachers. In D.Wood (Eds.), The gifted challenge: Challenging the gifted (pp.115 124). Merrylands, Australia: NSWAGTC, Inc.
Wall, A. (1993). How teacher location in the classroom can improve students’ behavior. The Clearing House. 66(5), 299.
Wichadee, S. (2010). Defining the effective English language teacher: Students’ and teachers’ perspectives. In Stoke, A.M (Ed.), JALT2009 Conference Proceedings.Tokyo: JALT.
Wichadee, S., & Orawiwatnakul, W. (2012). Characteristics of effective language teachers as perceived by low and high proficiency students. European Journal of Social Sciences, 31(3), 425-438.
Williams, M., & Burden,R.L.(1997). Psychology for language teachers: A socialconstructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
