Pre-Service Language Teachers' Autonomous Language Learning with Web 2.0 Tools and Mobile Applications

Authors

Abstract

Although the key role of utilizing Information and Communication Technology tools in foreign language learning and language teacher education is well-established in the literature, understanding the extent to which the student teachers of English are aware of and proficient in using ICT tools remains a key consideration. Therefore, this study was set out to investigate what Web 2.0 tools and mobile applications (henceforth apps) are used by student teachers in their personal and educational life. Consequently, this study, a) explored the familiarity of student teachers with available Web 2.0 tools and mobile apps, b) the frequency of the use of these tools, c) the aims of using these tools. The participants were 388 student teachers from two state universities in Turkey. The data were collected through a questionnaire with closed and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis of the questionnaire data and content analysis for the qualitative data. The findings revealed that most of the participants exhibited low degrees of familiarity and use towards the Web 2.0 tools and mobile apps. Results indicated that the most commonly used tools are the ones that contribute listening to and watching native and non-native English speakers. Moreover, student teachers do not know or use some technological tools such as corpus tools and virtual worlds, whose effects are well-established in the literature. One major implication of the results is that language teacher education programs offer a course on educational technology to student teachers of English.

Author Biographies

Ali Karakas, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

Assistant Prof. at the department of English Langauge Teaching, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey.

Galip Kartal, Necmettin Erbakan University

Assistant Prof. at the department of English Langauge Teaching, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey.

References

Agusalim, I. D., Assidiqi, M. H., Kom, A., & Muhammad, A. F. (2014). Developing mobile application of interactive English pronunciation training to improve EFL students’ pronunciation skill. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(33), 135-140.

Arikan A. (2008). Prospective English language teachers’ foreign Language skills and the Internet. Proceedings of E-Activity and Leading Technologies (IASK) – International Association for the Scientific Knowledge. Madrid, Spain.

Arkın, E. (2003). Teachers' attitudes towards computer technology use in vocabularyinstruction (Unpublished MA Dissertation). Bilkent University, Ankara.

Aşıksoy, G. (2018). ELT Students’ attitudes and awareness towards the use of Web 2.0 technologies for language learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 240-251.

Balbay, S., & Erkan, G. (2018). Perceptions of instructors on using Web 2.0 tools in academic English courses. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 10(2), 45-60.

Ban, R., & Summers, R. (2010). Using Web 2.0 tools for English as a foreign language teacher reflective practice. MexTesol Journal, 34(2), 1-9.

Barrs, K. (2011). Mobility in learning: the feasibility of encouraging language learning on smartphones. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2(3), 228-233.

Başal, A., Yılmaz, S., Tanrıverdi, A., & Sarı, L. (2016). Effectiveness of mobile applications in vocabulary teaching. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(1), 47-59. Retrieved February 11, 2019 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.12.008

BaÅŸal, A., & Aytan, T. (2014). Using Web 2.0 tools in English language teaching. International Conference ICT for Language Learning. 7th Edition Pixel. Italy. Retrieved from: http://conference.pixel-online.net/ICT4LL/files/ict4ll/ed0007/FP/1314-ICL807-FP ICT4LL7.pdf

Bennett, S., Bishop, A., Dalgarno, B., Waycott, J., & Kennedy, G. (2012). Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study. Computers & Education, 59, 524–534

Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.

Bott, A. (2005). Computer-aided self-access pronunciation materials designed to teach stress in American English. (Unpublished MA dissertation). Brigham: Brigham Young University.

Burston, J. (2011). Realizing the potential of mobile phone technology for language learning. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 41(2), 56-71. Retrieved February 5, 2018 from https://ialltjournal.org/index.php/ialltjournal/article/download/115/106

Bush, M. D. (2008). Computer-assisted language learning: From vision to reality? CALICO Journal, 25(3), 443-470.

Cephe P. T., & Balçıkanlı, C. (2012). Web 2.0 tools in language learning: What do student teachers think?. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (IJONTE), 3(1), 1-12.

Chan, H. W. (2016). Popular culture, English out-of-class activities, and learner autonomy among highly proficient secondary students in Hong Kong. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(8), 1918-1923.

Chartrand, R. (2012). Social networking for language learners: Creating meaningful output with Web 2.0 tools. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL), 4(1), 97-101.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2010). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.

Crook, C., Cummings, J., Fisher, T., Graber, R., Harrison, C., Lewin, C., et al. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape – Opportunities, challenges and tensions (research reports). Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA).

Deng, Q., & Trainin, G. (2015). Learning vocabulary with Apps: From theory to practice. The Nebraska Educator: A Student-led Journal. Paper 29. Retrieved February 10, 2019 from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebeducator/29

Duffy, P., (2009). Engaging the YouTube Google-Eyed generation: Strategies for using Web 2.0 in teaching and learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2(6), 119-129.

Ebadi, S., & Bashiri, S. (2018). Investigating EFL learners’ perspectives on vocabulary learning experiences through smartphone applications. Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 126-151.

Gangaiamaran, R., & Pasupathi, M. (2017). Review on use of mobile apps for language learning. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(21), 973– 4562.

Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 719-740.

Gerger, K. (2014). 1:1 tablet technology implementation in the Manhattan Beach Unified School District: A case study. Long Beach: California State University.

Goodwin-Jones, R. (2005). Emerging technologies: Skype and podcasting: Disruptive technologies for language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 9(3), 9–12.

Gourova, E., Asenova, A., Dulev, P. (2013). Integrated platform for mobile learning, In D. Sampson, P. Isaias, J. M. Spector., & D. Ifenthaler (eds.), Ubiquitous and Mobile Learning in the Digital Age (pp. 67-92). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Haggag, H. M. (2018). Teaching phonetics using a mobile-based application in an EFL context. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 14(14), 189-204.

Hofmann, J., & Miner, N. (2009). Tailored learning. Designing the blend that fits. Alexandria, Va.: ASTD Press.

Horzum, M. B. (2010). Investigating teachers’ Web 2.0 tools awareness, frequency and purposes of usage in Terms of Different Variables. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7/1, 604-634.

Hossain, M. (2018). Exploiting smartphones and apps for language learning: A case study with the EFL learners in a Bangladeshi university. Review of Public Administration and Management, 6(1), 1-5.

Huang, C.-K., Chao, Y.-C. & Lin, C.-Y. (2008). Web 2.0 in and out of the language classroom. Proceedings of the 2008 World CALL: Using technologies for language learning. Foukoka: Japan.

Huffman, K. (2017). Web 2.0: Beyond the concept practical ways to implement RSS, podcasts, and Wikis. Education Libraries, 29(1), 12-19.

İnce, M., & Akdemir, Ö. (2013). The investigations of using web 2.0 technologies on English writing skills of students with different learning styles. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 93-106.

Kartal, E., & Arikan, A. (2011). Future foreign language teachers and the online tools they use to learn about foreign languages, literatures and vultures. A paper presented at International eLearning Conference, 119-124. Impact Muang Thong Thani, Thailand.

KavaliauskienÄ—, G., & AnusienÄ—, L. (2009). English for specific purposes: Podcasts for listening skills. Coactivity/Santalka, 17(2) 28-37. doi: 10.3846/1822-430X.2009.17.2.28-37

Kavandı, E (2012). The effects of using blogs on the development of foreign language writing proficiency. (Unpublished Phd Thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.

Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Krause, K., Bishop, A., Chang, R., and Churchwood, A. (2007). The net generation are not big users of Web 2. 0 technologies: Preliminary findings, Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (Ed: R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, S. Soong, and C. Cheers), Singapore, Nanyang Technology University.

Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122.

Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning& Technology, 13(1), 79–95.

Kétyi, A. (2013). Using smart phones in language learning - A pilot study to turn CALL into MALL. In L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (eds). 20 Years of EUROCALL: Learning from the Past, Looking to the Future. Proceedings of the 2013 EUROCALL Conference, Évora, Portugal. Dublin/Voillans: Research-publishing.net.

Külekçi, G. (2009). Assessing the Attitudes of Pre-Service English Teachers towards the Use of the Internet. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 10(3), 153-160.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Laghari, Z. P., Kazi, H., & Nizamani, M. A. (2017). Mobile learning application development for improvement of English listening comprehension. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(8), 229-237.

Langer de Ramirez, L. (2010). Empower English language learners with tools from the web. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Levy, M., & Kennedy, C. (2005). Learning Italian via mobile SMS. In A. Kukulska-Hulme & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 76–83). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.

Liu, M. Navarrete, C. C., Maradiegue, E. & Wivagg, J. (2014). Mobile learning and English language learners: A case study of using iPod touch as a teaching and learning tool. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 25(3), 373-403.

Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440.

McGee, P. & Diaz, V. (2007). Wikis and podcasts and blogs! Oh my! What is a faculty member to do?. EDUCAUSE Review, 42(5), 1-11.

Mindog, E. (2016). Apps and EFL: A case study on the use of smartphone apps to learn English by four Japanese university students. The JALTCALL Journal, 12(1), 3-22.

MoNE. (2017a). T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı [Republic of Turkey, Ministry of National Education]. İngilizce Dersi Öğretim Programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) [English language curriculum] (Primary and lower secondary for Grades 2-8)]. Ankara: T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.

MoNE. (2017b). T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı [Republic of Turkey, Ministry of National Education]. İngilizce Dersi Öğretim Programı (Ortaöğretim, 9, 10, 11, 12. sınıflar) [English language curriculum] (High School for Grades 2-8)]. Ankara: T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.

MoNE. (2018). T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı [Republic of Turkey, Ministry of National Education]. 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu [Turkey’s 2023 Education Vision]. Ankara: T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.

Muhammed, A. A. (2014). The impact of mobiles on language learning on the part of English Foreign Language (EFL) university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 104-108. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.297

Murphy, G. D. (2011). Post-PC devices: a summary of early iPad technology adoption in tertiary environments. E-journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 5(1), 18-32

Özel, A. (2013). The use of the Internet and Web 2.0 tools among EFL instructors. Akdeniz University. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Akdeniz University: Antalya.

Özel, A. G., & Arikan, A. (2015). The use of the internet and web 2.0 tools among EFL instructors. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 5, 313-325.

Pilar, R. A., Jorge, A., & Cristina, C. (2013). The use of current mobile learning applications in EFL. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1189-1196.

Pinkman, K. (2005). Using blogs in the foreign language classroom: Encouraging learner independence. The JALT CALL Journal, 1(1), 12–24.

Prashnig, B. (2006). Learning styles and personalised teaching. London: Continuum International Publishing.

Rahimi, M. & Miri, S. S. (2014). The impact of mobile dictionary use on language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1469-1474. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.567

Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rosell-Aguliar, F. (2014). How smartphone apps are revolutionising language learning. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/how-smartphone-apps-are-revolutionising-language-learning-25165

Şahin Kızıl, A. (2011). EFL Teachers attitudes towards information and communication technologies (ICT). 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium. Fırat University, Erzuurm.

Şahin Kızıl, A. (2015). Investigating the impact of wikis on writing performance of EFL students. Öz, H. (Ed.). Language and Communication Research around the Globe: Exploring Untested Ideas (pp.103-126). New York: Untested Ideas Research Center.

Şahin Kızıl, A. (2017a). Exploring EFL learners' use of web 2.0 tools: Preliminary findings. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 27, 28-40. doi:10.5505/ pausbed.2017.71602

Şahin Kızıl, A. (2017b). EFL learners in the digital age: An investigation into personal and educational digital engagement. RELC Journal, 48(3), 373-388.

Saklavcı, A. (2010). The use of the internet among EFL teachers at high schools in Eskişehir (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Anadolu University, Eskişehir.

SeleviÄienÄ—, E., & BurkÅ¡aitienÄ—, N. (2016). University students’ attitudes towards the usage of Web 2.0 tools for learning ESP. A preliminary investigation. Societal Studies, 7(2), 270-291.

Shahrokni, S. A., & Sadeqjoola, L. (2015). Iranian EFL teachers' perception, familiarity and use of Web 2.0 tools in TEFL. Teaching English with Technology, 15(3), 31-46.

Shishkovskaya, J. V., & Sokolova, E. Y. (2015). Integration of Web 2.0 technologies into the process of students’ self-directed English learning. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 541-545.

Solmaz O., & Bekleyen N. (2011). The use of the Internet by high school EFL teachers for professional purposes. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. Retrieved from http://edusbed.com/Makaleler/213372437_ID43%20s.17-28.pdf

Son, J. (2011, June). Online tools for language teaching. TESL-EJ, 15(1). Retrieved from http://www.teslej.org/wordpress/issues/volume15/ej57/ej57int/

Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: examining the effect of the platform. Language learning & technology, 14 (2), 95-110

Suwantaratip, O. &Orawiwantakul, W. (2015). Using mobile assisted exercises to support students’ vocabulary skill development. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 163-171

Thomas, K. & O’Bannon, B. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: Preservice teachers answer the call. Computers and Education Journal, 85, 110-122.

Thompson, J. (2007). Is education 1.0 ready for Web 2.0 students? Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4), 1-6.

Thorne, S., & Payne, J. (2005). Evolutionary trajectories, Internet mediated expression, and language education. CALICO, 22(3), 371–397.

Thornton, P. & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 217-228. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00129.x

Tschirhart, C., & Rigler, E. (2009). LondonMet e-packs: a pragmatic approach to learner/teacher autonomy. Language Learning Journal, 37(1), 71–83.

Wang, S., & Vasquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? CALICO Journal, 29(3), 412-430.

Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a game, right?: Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 69–7.

Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2007). Audience, authorship, and artefact: the emergent semiotics of Web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–23.

Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and second language learning. In J. Rosenthal (Ed.), Handbook of undergraduate second language education (pp. 303-318). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Watkins, J., & Wilkins, M. (2011). Using YouTube in the EFL classroom. Language Education in Asia, 2(1), 113-119.

Xiao, J. & Luo, Y. (2015). Application of mobile learning system in phonetics teaching. International conference on social science, Atlantis Press, China.

Yaman, Ä°., Åženel, M., & YeÅŸilel, D. B. A. (2015). Exploring the extent to which ELT students utilise smartphones for language learning purposes. South African Journal of Education, 35(4), 1-9.

Zeng, S. (2015). English Learning with Web 2.0: An investigation into Chinese undergraduates’ technology (non)-use and perspectives. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), London: UCL Institute of Education.

Usluel, Y. K., Mazman, S. G., & Arıkan, A. (2009). Prospective teachers’ awareness of collaborative web 2.0 tools. The IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2009.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-30

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction

Section

Articles

License

Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.

Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.