A Comparative Survey of Environmental Education Goals Between the UNESCO Framework and 10th Grade Palestine Curriculum.

Authors

  • Muneer Jebreel Karama

Abstract

The  present research, being one string of the Environmental Education (EE), aims to study, and analyze EE objectives in the Palestinian 10th grade textbook from an international point view , namely : to conduct a comparative  survey of environmental education goals  between  the UNESCO framework  and  10th  grade Palestine Curriculum. To achieve this aim, the researcher refers to the UNESCO framework as a standard tool of EE, then analyzes the Palestinian 10th grade textbook in light of this tool. The finding of the research indicated that there are partial consistently between the UNESCO EE, and Palestinian 10th grade textbook in two levels of objectives (2 and 3), while there is no match on the other two levels of objectives (1 and 4), on the light of these finding the researcher recommends to policy makers, and the Palestinian writing team of the Environmental Education Curriculum to reform objectives on the light of international trends toward Environmental Education.

References

Arrasmith, D.G. (1995). Implementation of environmental education in Washington public schools. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Auer, M. R. (2010). Sense of place and the physical senses in outdoor environmental learning. In H. L. Reynolds, E. S. Brondizio, & J. M. Robinson (Eds.), Teaching environmental literacy: Across campus and across the curriculum (pp. 142-149). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Blum, A. (1987). Students’ knowledge and believes concerning environmental issues in four countries. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(1), 7-13.

Borah, P. (2007). 4th International conference on environmental education: Environmental education towards a sustainable future--partners for the decade of education for sustainable development: Final report. Ahmedabad: Centre for Environment Education.

Brody, M. J. (1996). An assessment of 4th, 8th, and 11th grade students’ environmental science knowledge related to Oregon’s marine resources, Journal of Environmental Education, 27(3), 21-28.

Communications Office of the United Nations Development Programme /Programme of Assistance to the Palestinian People. (2005). Education for all. Focus, 2(5), 13.

Environmental Management Programs Directory. (2015). EnviroEducation.com. Environmental Management Programs Directory, EnviroEducation.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Dec. 2015

Gambro, J.S and H.N.Zwitzky. (1996). A national survey of high school students’ environmental knowledge . Journal of Environmental Education.Volume 27, Issue 3,1, Pages 28-34.

Giolitto, P., Mathot, L., Pardo, A., & Vergnes, G. (1997). Environmental education in the European Union. Brussels, Luxembourg, Page 37.

Hoody, L. (1995). The educational efficacy of environmental education: An interim report. California: State Education and Environment Roundtable, Page 14.

Klimov, A.V., & Ukolov, A. I. (1994). The system of ecological education: The problems of the development of the universal system of ecological education. Ukraine State University, Pages 57-85.

Palestinian Ministry of Education. (2011). Health and Environment in our Life, Grade 10, Pages 3-121.

Palmer, J.A. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century: Theory, practice, progress and promise. London: Routledge.

Sterling, S. and Cooper, G. (1992). In touch: Environmental education for Europe. Surrey, UK: WWF, Panad House.

The National American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE). (1999). Excellence in Environmental Education – Guidelines for Leaning (K-12): Executive summary and self-assessment tool. Rock Spring, Page 31.

UNESCO-UNEP International Environmental Education Programme. (1994).A prototype environmental education curriculum for the middle school, Environmental Education Series 9, Pages 1-3.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-09