Reflective thinking and teaching practices: A study on pre-service teachers’ perceptions and improvement of reflection in the curriculum development course
Reflective thinking and teaching practices
Abstract
The current study aimed to investigate the Curriculum Development Course knowledge levels of pre-service teachers and the depth of their reflections. In this explanatory mixed-method research study, pre-service teachers who enrolled in the Elementary Education-Classroom Teaching Department in two state universities of Turkey were included. The data collected through an achievement test, a reflective thinking scale, and a reflective writing form were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical analysis techniques. Also, the writings of pre-service teachers were analyzed according to Hatton and Smith’s (1995) framework. The results showed that taking Curriculum Development Course enriched with reflective writing activities increased pre-service teacher’s course knowledge and resulted in significantly higher reflection levels in some dimensions of reflective thinking. However, there was scarcity in the number of dialogical and critical reflections. The findings were discussed and some implications for researchers were proposed. Keywords: Curriculum development course, journal writing, pre-service teachers, reflective thinkingReferences
Ayan, D. (2010). Promoting EFL pre-service teachers’ self-directed learning through electronic portfolios: A case study (Master’s Thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
Akar, D. (2019). Tecrübeli ve göreve yeni başlayan sınıf öğretmenlerinin yansıtıcı düşünme eğilimleri ve karar verme stilleri arasındaki ilişki (Master’s thesis). Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale.
Bain, J. D., Mills, C., Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Developing reflection on practice through journal writing: Impacts of variations in the focus and level of feedback. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 8(2), 171-195. doi: 10.1080/13540600220127368
BaÅŸol, G. & Evin-Gencel, Ä°. (2013). Reflective thinking scale: A validity and reliability study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 929-946.
Choy, S. C., Yim, J. S. C. & Tan, P. L. (2017). Reflective thinking among preservice teachers: A Malaysian perspective. Issues in Educational Research, 27(2), 234-251. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier27/choy.pdf
Chirema, K. D. (2007). The use of reflective journals in the promotion of reflection and learning in post-registration nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 27, 192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.04.007
Cigdem, H. (2012). Bilişim teknolojileri öğretmen adaylarinin öğretmenlik uygulaması dersinde blog aracılığı ile tuttukları günlüklerin yansıtıcı düşünme düzeylerine etkisi (Doctoral dissertation). Anadolu University, Eskişehir.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Cohen-Sayag, E., & Fischl, D. (2012). Reflective writing in pre-service teachers' teaching: What does it promote? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(10), 20-36. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2012v37n10.1
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D.C., Heath and Company.
Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using spss. (3th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Fox, R. K., Dodman, S., & Holincheck, N. (2019). Moving beyond reflection in a hall of mirrors: Developing critical reflective capacity in teachers and teacher educators. Reflective Practice, 20(3), 367-382. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2019.1617124
Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn-Bacon.
Gelter, H. (2003). Why is reflective thinking uncommon. Reflective Practice, 4(3), 337-344. doi: 10.1080/1462394032000112237
Gocuk, S. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel ve yansıtıcı düşünme düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (Master’s thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.
Griffin, M. L. (2003) Using critical incidents to promote and assess reflective thinking in preservice teachers. Reflective Practice, 4(2), 207–220.
Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
Hewitt, J., Pedretti, E., Bencze, L., Vaillancourt, B. D., & Yoon, S. (2003). New applications for multimedia cases: Promoting reflective practice in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 483-500.
Higher Education Institute. (YÖK, 2007). Öğretmen yetiştirme ve eğitim fakülteleri (1982-2007): Öğretmenin üniversitede yetiştirilmesinin değerlendirilmesi [Teacher Training and Faculties of Education (1982-2007): Evaluation of Teacher Training in Universities]. Ankara: Yüksek Öğretim Kurulu.
Ho, B., & Richards, J. C. (1993). Reflective thinking through teacher journal writing: Myths and realities. Prospect, 8, 7-24.
Hramiak, A., Boulton, H. & Irwin, B. (2009). Trainee teachers’ use of blogs as private reflections for professional development. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(3), 259-269. doi: 10.1080/17439880903141521
Kember, D. (1999) Determining the level of reflective thinking from students' written journal using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18(1), 18-30. doi: 10.1080/026013799293928
Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P, Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K.,…,& Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381-395. doi: 10.1080/713611442
Levin, B. B., He, Y., & Robbins, H. H. (2006). Comparative analysis of preservice teachers’ reflective thinking in synchronous versus asynchronous online case discussions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 439-460.
Lin, X. D., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43–62. doi: 10.1007/BF02299633
Ministry of National Education (MONE 2010). Okul yöneticileri ve öğretmenler için okul temelli mesleki gelişim kılavuzu [The School Based Professional Development Guide]. Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitimi Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L, Gloeckner, G. W. & Barrett, K. C. (2007). Spss for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Moon, J. (2004). A Handbook of reflective and experiential learning. Routledge Falmer, London.
Moussa-Inaty, J. (2015). Reflective Writing through the Use of Guiding Questions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(1), 104-113.
Namvar, Y., Naderi, E., Shariatmadari, A. & Seifnaraghi, M. (2009). Studying the impact of web-based learning (weblog) with a problem solving approach on students’ reflective thinking. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 4(2), 33-38. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v4i2.725
Poom-Valickis, K. & Mathews, S. (2013). Reflecting others and own practice: An analysis of novice teachers’ reflection skills. Reflective Practice, 14(3), 420–434. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2013.767237
Robichaux, R. R, & Guarino, A. J. (2012). Enhancing preservice teachers’ professionalism through daily teaching reflections. doi: 10.1155/2012/452687
Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. The Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842-886. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00181
Shoffner, M. (2009). The place of the personal: Exploring the affective domain through reflection in teacher preparation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 783-789. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.012
Sparks-Langer, G. M., Simmons, J. M., Pasch, M., Colton, A., & Starko, A. (1990). Reflective pedagogical thinking: How can we promote it and measure it? Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 23-32. doi: 10.1177/002248719004100504
Sanal-Erginel, S. (2006). Developing reflective teachers: A study on perception and improvement of reflection in pre-service teacher education (Doctoral Dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Thorpe, K. (2004). Reflective learning journals: From concept to practice. Reflective Practice, 5(3), 327-343. doi: 10.1080/1462394042000270655
Valli, L. (1997). Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States. Peabody Journal of Education. 72(1), 67–88. doi: 10.1207/s15327930pje7201_4
Yang, S. H. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 11−21.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.