The Situation of ESP in EFL Economics Classes
Abstract
ESP is defined as an approach to teaching English for any purpose that could be specified. It is concerned with what to teach in a context where learners are classified as homogeneous sharing a set of specific needs. Accordingly, the purpose of the present study is to explore the situation of ESP teaching and learning in a class of third year graduate students at the department of Economics, university of M’sila, Algeria. The investigator attempts to know whether the ESP approach to EFL teaching is applied in such a specific class. To this end, 49 students have been randomly chosen as a representative sample joined by their ESP teacher who is a specialist in the same department. Data has been collected through using two research instruments: a questionnaire for students, and a structured interview for the teacher. It has been, then, analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The results revealed that students are exposed to a general English kind of teaching with much focus on learning economic terms and translating short texts into the mother tongue language (Arabic), and with little awareness of their academic as well as professional needs (once in a workplace). Additionally, the ESP teacher expressed his felt need for a specific "teacher training." The results could make the ESP teachers aware of what is really needed in this very context. Hence, ESP approaches should be applied to teaching English for different specialized subjects, each according to its needs.References
Allen, J. P. B., & Widdowson, H. G. (1974). Teaching the communicative use of English. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 12(1-4), 1-22.
Anthony, L. (1997). ESP: What does it mean? Retrieved from the World Wide Web on Dec. 5, 2006, on CUE.
Carver, D. (1983). Some propositions about ESP. English for Specific Purposes, 2(2), 131-137.
Coffey, B. (1984). State of the art article: ESP—English for specific purposes. Language Teaching, 17(1), 2-16.
Donna, S. (2000). Teach business English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dudley-Evans, A., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ewer, J. R., & Latorre, G. (1969). A course in basic scientific English. London: Longman.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learning centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morrow, K. (1980). Skills for reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strevens, P. (1988). ESP after twenty years: A re-appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), ESP: State of the Art (pp. 1-13). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Centre.
Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.
Strevens, P. (1977). Special purpose language learning: A perspective, Language Teaching and Linguistics Abstracts, (10), 145-163.
Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
